Ruuger (
ruuger) wrote in
b5_revisited2009-02-15 10:25 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
"Infection" discussion [spoilers]
This is the discussion post for the episode 1X04, "Infection". Spoilers for the whole of the series, including the spin-offs and tie-ins, are allowed here so newbies beware.
Extra reading:
The article for "Infection" at Lurker's Guide.
Extra reading:
The article for "Infection" at Lurker's Guide.
no subject
I.e. we have the presentation of the reporter in a bad light when in fact she was doing her job. And that's a pattern on this show. Again, I don't mean an episode like The Illusion of Truth where the media is already under Clark's control, but before, and after.
And unfortunately nobody ever notices that when (if?) it is used to do good.
I'd say Watergate has burned itself into the public consciousness as a prime example of the power of the media used for good in real life. In my own country, Germany, one major incident in the early 60s was when the secretary of state had a reporter and an editor arrested in Spain (where they were vacationing) for a story the magazine Der Spiegel had printed. This, the "Spiegel Affair", ended with the secretary of state dismissed (and the journalist freed, of course), and was celebrated as a victory for the relatively young post WWII democracy.
no subject
Fair point - I amend "never" to "rarely"...
BTW:
The reporter here serves no purpose to the story
Arguably, her purpose is to be the trigger for Sinclair's speech at the end.
Not very good writing to have character with nothing but an extra-textual function, though...
no subject