Ruuger (
ruuger) wrote in
b5_revisited2009-04-20 11:45 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
"Signs and Portents" discussion [spoilers]
Sorry for the delay - my internet connection was down last night.
This is the discussion post for the episode 1X13, "Signs and Portents". Spoilers for the whole of the series, including the spin-offs and tie-ins, are allowed here so newbies beware.
Extra reading:
The article for "Signs and Portents" at Lurker's Guide.
This is the discussion post for the episode 1X13, "Signs and Portents". Spoilers for the whole of the series, including the spin-offs and tie-ins, are allowed here so newbies beware.
Extra reading:
The article for "Signs and Portents" at Lurker's Guide.
no subject
I've always felt that the Coming of Shadows decision was understandable, albeit mistaken in it's assumptions. Of course, Londo himself gets treated to a (bitter) taste of what might have been when G'Kar buys him a drink before word of the attack gets out. Londo's damnation comes when he continues to use the Shadows despite past mistakes and with full knowledge of what he's unleashing on the Narn as a direct result of his actions. Up to then he's still redeemable, except (probably) in Vorlon eyes.