"Deathwalker" discussion [spoilers]
Mar. 22nd, 2009 09:35 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
This is the discussion post for the episode 1X09, "Deathwalker". Spoilers for the whole of the series, including the spin-offs and tie-ins, are allowed here so newbies beware.
Extra reading:
The article for "Deathwalker" at Lurker's Guide.
Extra reading:
The article for "Deathwalker" at Lurker's Guide.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-24 09:03 pm (UTC)I was a little annoyed with Ambassador Kalika; she gets all up in Sinclair's face about how terrible the debate was, when in actual fact what happened was: there was a vote, and it didn't go her way. If they're going to start threatening to blow up the station every time someone loses an argument, B5 is in even more trouble than we already thought...
I'd forgotten how important Kosh is in this episode (despite a relatively low level of screentime). We get much more of a sense of him and of the Vorlons here - the ruthlessness he uses against Talia, the (politically helpful but rather sketchy - talk about your Deus Ex Machina, too!) Vorlon ship that blows up Deathwalker's vessel, the hilarious and/or gnomic Vorlon sayings ("at the hour of scampering" is still my favourite).
I liked Sinclair and Garibaldi and their relationship here. I have such a strong sense of their friendship, Garibaldi apologising for getting angry with Sinclair and the two of them in the bar at the end, working together throughout the episode... G'Kar and Na'Toth are also good together; we get more of their characters, and of Narn society - I liked the conversation about the blood oath, and G'Kar saying "You would not be Narn if you did", and the respect they clearly have for each other. Plus: Na'Toth flipping out is *scary*, man! Don't want to be on the wrong side of her.
Minor nitpick: they kept calling the jumpgate "the vortex". I don't remember that ever happening anywhere else - someone didn't have the series bible? :)
This is a decent episode; not great, but solid, and it's pretty good as a "Not Your Father's Star Trek" thing; it's more shades-of-grey than Trek usually goes for (though there are exceptions!). Good stuff.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-25 02:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-25 01:33 pm (UTC)Yeah... I can see why she'd be upset, definitely. And the Centauri and the Narn were clearly operating in bad faith. But at the same time, the Council did actually work as designed; the powers voted, including the League, and that's the answer they got. The way it's set up, with one vote for each of the major races and one for the League means that it's *always* true that they have to have half the major races on their side to get anywhere.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-25 01:33 pm (UTC)I wouldn't call it Deus ex Machina - it is consistent with Kosh's absences from the council, which are commented upon in the course of the episode.
it's more shades-of-grey than Trek usually goes for
The nature of the scenario reminded me of Star Trek, too.
The whole thing feels a bit like a Trek dilemma done differently.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-25 01:37 pm (UTC)I was thinking more of the way that they're stuck with an apparently unsolvable dilemma, and then bam, the Vorlons jump in and fix it. It amused me to think of it that way :)
The whole thing feels a bit like a Trek dilemma done differently.
Yeah, that's kind of what I was thinking; there's more pragmatism and politics than, say, Picard would have had to deal with, I think. I like Star Trek, but it's a much simpler world, generally.